Post by account_disabled on Feb 24, 2024 10:36:40 GMT
The guidelines drawn up by Google for its quality raters until 15 December 2022 were based on three concepts contained in the acronym EAT: Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness (Competence, Authoritativeness, Reliability). Today quality raters must carry out their work taking into account one more E, that of Experience , and the mantra they must repeat in their mind is EEAT . Those who deal with SEO know how important the user experience is to improve the ranking of a web page and position it among the top places of the SERP, but now the Mountain View search engine gives the term " experience" an additional, important, meaning. It's time to clarify things a bit by explaining: Who are the quality raters? What does “experience” mean within EEAT? Why is trust in Google ratings essential? You might be interested.
Browsing the web pages linked from the search engine's SERP, evaluate a series of factors to understand if they are really in line with the expectations of those typing a particular query. This human tester performs quality Afghanistan Mobile Number List control on the performance of the algorithm that returns responses to users. In the general guidelines for quality raters Google highlights the value and responsibility of this activity, saying: “As a search quality assessor, you will help evaluate the quality of search engines around the world. Good search engines provide useful results for people in their specific language and location. Experience , in the guidelines for Google evaluators, does not refer to user experience, i.
The sensations the user experiences when browsing a site, but is a concept closely linked to the quality of content . The quality rater is asked to evaluate the reliability of those who create the content published on a web page, in fact Google explains the "experience factor" with these words: “Consider the extent to which the content creator has the necessary first-hand or life experience for the topic. Many types of pages are reliable and serve their purpose well when created by people with extensive personal experience. For example, what would you trust: a product review from someone who has used it themselves or a “review” from someone who hasn’t?
Browsing the web pages linked from the search engine's SERP, evaluate a series of factors to understand if they are really in line with the expectations of those typing a particular query. This human tester performs quality Afghanistan Mobile Number List control on the performance of the algorithm that returns responses to users. In the general guidelines for quality raters Google highlights the value and responsibility of this activity, saying: “As a search quality assessor, you will help evaluate the quality of search engines around the world. Good search engines provide useful results for people in their specific language and location. Experience , in the guidelines for Google evaluators, does not refer to user experience, i.
The sensations the user experiences when browsing a site, but is a concept closely linked to the quality of content . The quality rater is asked to evaluate the reliability of those who create the content published on a web page, in fact Google explains the "experience factor" with these words: “Consider the extent to which the content creator has the necessary first-hand or life experience for the topic. Many types of pages are reliable and serve their purpose well when created by people with extensive personal experience. For example, what would you trust: a product review from someone who has used it themselves or a “review” from someone who hasn’t?